Follow-up to earlier Open Letter regarding 4/8/21 Washington Post article by Letitia James and William Tong, Attorneys General for New York and Connecticut

Rogier van Vlissingen
2 min readApr 24, 2021

Dear Madam Attorney General:

This is to suggest that the time may have come for a retraction of the above article. The damage of information suppression is becoming clearer by the day, and the social media companies are part of the problem set, not part of the solution set. This problem of withholding information is not uncommon with pharmaceutical companies, but even now, where they have already received a liability waiver from the government, this is still going on and aided and abetted by parties such as Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other media, social or otherwise.

The Infection Survival Rates as per CDC are:

Ages 00–19: 99.997%

Ages 20–49: 99.98%

Ages 50–69: 99.5%

Ages 70+: 94.6%

And it should be noted that the median Covid death is still above the average life expectancy and has multiple comorbidities. In short, we do not have a virus problem, we have a comorbidity problem. In 80% of cases obesity is the primary factor.

Meanwhile, it should be noted that in the 1976 Swine Flu, after 40 million vaccinations there were 500 cases of GBS (Guillain Barré Syndrome), with 25 deaths, for a GBS cfr of 5% and a moratorium on the vaccine was declared, as per Prof. Alexander Muir, reporting at the time (Sept 1979) in the Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, Vol. 72.

We are currently at a level in the UK of 168 cases of thromboembolic events WITH thrombocytopenia (low platelet counts), for 32 deaths, or a cfr of 19%. (https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting) — as per Tweets from Andrew Bostom, MD, MS, on 4/23/21. In the US, the reporting of adverse events in the VAERS database, with the vaccines that are in use here are steadily climbing also.
Statistically it is, according to Prof. Sucharit Bhakdi, and others versed in medical research, effectively impossible, given the low IFR for the under 70, (IFR=0.05%) to prove to a level of statistical significance that a vaccine would reduce risk. Former Pfizer VP Dr. Michael Yeadon also points out that it is irresponsible to vaccinate the under 70, given the low risk and he does not hesitate to call doing so criminal under the Nuremberg code. Above 70, there might be a case, but it should happen with informed consent only.

The Nuremberg Code makes it very clear that no one should ever be forced to take an experimental medicine as these vaccines clearly are, until at least early 2023, still this is now the track we seem to be on, but meanwhile the international legal cooperation under the German Corona-Ausschuss is gaining traction very strongly. The bottom line is the regime we are under is promoting crimes against humanity and I don’t think the states should protect the perpetrators at the expense of the rights of citizens. If information is being suppressed, informed consent is categorically compromised.

Commending the above to your urgent attention.

--

--